Section 0.1 – Compound Statements¶
definition: A statement or proposition has a truth value.
Examples
If we denote our statement as p
.
p = "7 is a prime number"
In this case p = true
.
q = "The square root of 2 is an integer"
In this case q = false
.
r = "Every positive integer except two is the sum of two primes" e.g. 6 = 3 + 3 10 = 3 + 7
This statement is unknown and is an outstanding question in mathematics.
Non Examples¶
"Is 187698736 prime?"
This is a question not a statement.
"If n is even"
This is a condition not a statement.
definition: A compound statement is formed by combining multiple statements.
Conjunction¶
Let $p$ and $q$ be statements. The conjunction of $p$ and $q$ is written:
Truth Table¶
$p$ | $q$ | $ p \wedge q $ |
---|---|---|
True | True | True |
True | False | False |
False | True | False |
False | False | False |
Disjunction¶
Let $p$ and $q$ be statements. The disjunction[^math-inclusive-or] of $p$ and $q$ is written: [^math-inclusive-or]: In mathematics or is always inclusive.
Truth Table¶
$p$ | $q$ | $ p \vee q $ |
---|---|---|
True | True | True |
True | False | True |
False | True | True |
False | False | False |
Implication¶
Let $p$ and $q$ be statements. The implication of $p$ to $q$ is written:
This implies a if p then q
relationship.
Truth Table¶
$p$ | $q$ | $ p \rightarrow q $ |
---|---|---|
True | True | True |
True | False | False |
False | True | True |
False | False | True |
Implication¶
$p$ is the hypothesis, $q$ is the conclusion.
- $p$ is sufficient for $q$
- $q$ is necessary for $p$
Examples
(9 is odd) $\to$ (cats have fur)
This is true
, because nine is odd.
(Fish live on land) $\to$ (10 is prime)
This is false
because fish don't live on land.
Bicondition or Double Implication¶
- Means $ p \to q $ and $ q \to p $
- $p$ and $q$ have the same truth value
$p$ | $q$ | $ p \leftrightarrow q $ |
---|---|---|
True | True | True |
True | False | False |
False | True | False |
False | False | True |
Said as "$p$ if and only if $q$" or "$p$ iff $q$"
Negation¶
definition: The negation of a statement $p$, written:
$p$ | $\rightharpoondown p $ |
---|---|
True | False |
False | True |
Notation: $\rightharpoondown$ supersedes any other notation. So:
DeMorgan's Laws¶
Example
$p =$ "John owns a cat"
$q =$ "John owns a dog"
Find:
Solution
We only need to break on one half to negate it.
So $ \rightharpoondown ( p \wedge q ) =$ "John doesn't own a cat or he does not own a dog"
Contrapositive¶
definition: The contrapositive of $p \to q$ is written:
Example
The contrapositive of "If it rains in the morning I will bring an umbrella" is "If I did not bring an umbrella than it did not rain this morning".
Converse¶
definition: The converse[^f1] of $p \to q$ is written:
Example
The converse of "If it rains in the morning I will bring an umbrella" is "If I brought an umbrella it was raining this morning"[^f2].
[^f1]: While the contrapositive is is logically equivalent to the statement the converse is not. [^f2]: this is not logically equivalent.
$p$ | $q$ | $ p \to q $ | $ \rightharpoondown q \to \rightharpoondown p $ | $ q \to p $ |
---|---|---|---|---|
True | True | True | True | True |
True | False | False | False | True |
False | True | True | True | False |
False | False | True | True | True |
Quantifiers¶
Universal Quantifier¶
"For all integers $n$, $2n$ is even".
For all is the quantifier as it quantifies the amount. In this case it is the universal quantifier equivalent to:
- For all... (duh)
- For each...
- For every...
- $\forall$
Existential Quantifier¶
definition: The existential quantifier states that this statement applies for some but not all things. It can be written:
- For some...
- There exists a...
- $\exists$
Example
"Some rectangles are squares" can be written "$\exists$ a rectangle $R$, such that $R$ is square"
Example
Write the following in plain english:
Where the universe of $x$ and $y$ is the integers.
Solution
For all integers $x$ there exists a $y$ such that the sum of $x$ and $y$ is zero.
Example
Write the following in plain english:
Where the universe of $x$ and $y$ is the integers.
Solution
This is not true because there not all $x$'s would make zero for any $y$.
Negation of Quantifiers¶
Example
Prove,
Solution
This becomes,
Which we can prove by example.
Set Notation¶
$ \in $ denotes that something belongs to a set.
Example